Negaim 14:10 - 14:11

נטל מלוג השמן – that he brought up the LOG [of oil] with the guilt-offering in the place of its slaughtering in the north and it was designated there.

לתוך כפו של חבירו – as it is written (Leviticus 14:15): “[The priest shall take some of the LOG of oil] and pour it into palm of the Kohen’s [left hand], which implies that the Kohen who is doing the sprinkling would pour into the palm of another Kohen.

כנגד בית קדשי הקדשים – because it states (Leviticus 14:16): “seven times before the LORD.” But he would not bring in the oil to sprinkle opposite the curtain, but rather he would stand in the Courtyard and would turn his face to the side of the House of the Holy of Holies and would sprinkle on the ground of the Courtyard.

על כל הזאה טבילה (for every sprinkling is a [corresponding] dipping [of the finger]) – for every time that he sprinkles, he dips his finger in the oil, but not that he would dip his finger one time and sprinkle from that dipping two or three sprinklings, for seven times, refers to the dipping of the finger as well.

בין שנתן בין שלא נתן כיפר – and the person is pure.

ומעלין עליו כאילו לא כיפר (but so far as the priest is concerned, it is credited to him as if he didn’t make atonement) – before Heaven, for he did not perform the commandment in the best way. But the Halakha is not according to Rabbi Yohanan ben Nuri.

חסר הלוג – the oil of the leper.

עד שלא יצק (before he poured it out) – to his left palm, he should fill it. But we don’t say that the LOG was established for him which are the sacred vessels.

עד שלא נתן – seven gifts. For Rabbi Shimon holds that the giving of the seven [sprinklings] establishes it, and not the pouring. But the Halakah is not according to Rabbi Shimon.

הכל הולך אחר החטאת – for in the sin-offering and the burnt offering, the rich and poor are divided/separated, that the rich brings from the cattle, and the poor brings from the fowl, two turtle-doves or two pigeons, therefore, if at the time of the offering of the sin-offering, he was poor and he brought the sin offering of fowl, even though he became rich afterwards, he would supplement the sacrifice of the poor person and bring the burnt offering of a fowl. And similarly, if he was rich and he brought the sin-offering of cattle, even though he became poor, he needs to bring the burnt offering of cattle.

רבי יהודה אומר אחר האשם – that with regard to the guilt-offering, the poor and rich are equivalent, and it is the first of the sacrifices of the leper, and designated for his purification more than all others. And both of them are expounded upon from one Scriptural verse, as it is written (Leviticus 14:32): "אשר לא-תשיג ידו בטהרתו"/”and whose means for his purification are limited,” Rabbi Shimon holds that that which procures atonement for him, and that is the sin-offering. But Rabbi Yehuda holds the thing that makes him fit and purifies him, and that is the guilt-offering. And the Halakha is according to Rabbi Yehuda.