Menachos 4:3 - 4:4

הפר ואילים הכבשים והשעיר – that come on account of the loaf [of bread]. And all of them are burnt-offerings except for the goat which is a sin-offering.

אין מעכבין את הלחם – that if they brought the two loaves of Atzeret/Shavuot without these sacrifices, they are sanctified.

הלחם מעכב את הכבשים – these lambs are the two lambs of the peace-offerings that were required for waving with the loaves.

והכבשים אין מעכבים את הלחם – if lambs were not found, they bring the two loaves and they are holy as if they had brought them with the lambs.

קרבו כבשים בלא לחם – for they didn’t have bread in the wilderness other than Manna.

הלכה כדברי בן ננס – that the lambs impair the [loaves of] bread.

אבל אין הטעם כדבריו – for he says that in the wilderness that they offered up the lambs of peace-offerings and this is not the case.

שכל האמור בחומש הפקודים – in the Book of Numbers, as for example, the Musaf/Additional sacrifices that are mentioned in the Torah portion of Pinhas (Numbers 28:16-29:39), they offered up in the wilderness.

וכל האמור בת"כ – that is in the Book of Leviticus. They did not offer them up in the wilderness. And these lambs that are mentioned in “Speak to the Kohanim” (the Torah portion of Emor) such as the seven lambs and the bull and the rams of the burnt offering that are upon the [loaves of] bread and the two lambs of the peace offerings they did not offer up in the wilderness (see Leviticus 23:18).

ויש בלא כבשים אין לו מי יתירנו – that the [loaves of] bread is not permitted to be consumed for the Kohanim until they offer up the lambs. And the Halakha is according to Rabbi Shimon.

התמידים אינן מעכבין את המוספין – In the Gemara (Tractate Menahot 49a) it explains that concerning the matter of precedence it is stated, and they do not impair each other. For if he requires daily whole offerings, he offers them first and if he requires Musaf/Additional offerings, he offers them first, but even though it is written (Leviticus 6:5): “[every morning the priest shall feed wood to it,] lay out the burnt offering on it [and turn into smoke the fat parts of the offerings of well-being],” and this implies that the burnt-offering, that is, the burnt-offering of the daily whole offering will be the first of all of the sacrifice, but this is not other than a mere commandment but it does not impair [the others].

אמר רבי שמעון אימתי כו' – In the Gemara (Tractate Menahot 50a) it explains that the Mishnah is deficient and it should be read as follows: if they did not offer up a lamb in the morning, he should not offer it up at eventide. When is this said? When the altar was not dedicated, but if the altar was dedicated, he can offer it up at eventide. Rabbi Shimon stated: Under what circumstances? When they subject to constraint or in error, but if they deliberately did not offer a lamb in the morning, they should not offer it at eventide. And this is its explanation: if they did not offer the daily whole offering of the morning, they should not offer the daily whole offering of the eventide, and this is a rabbinic expounding of Scripture, if (Numbers 28:4): “you shall offer one lamb in the morning, [and the other lamb you shall offer at twilight],” the second was pronounced fit to be offered at eventide, but if not, you don’t. Under what circumstances? When the altar was not dedicated, for this Biblical verse is written concerning the dedication of the altar in the Torah portion of “You (i.e., Moses) shall command”/Tetzaveh, as it is written above it (Exodus 29:38): “Now this is what you shall offer upon the altar: [two yearling lambs each day, regularly],” But if the altar was dedicated, that he had already offered upon it sacrifices, even if he did not offer the daily whole offering of the morning, he may offer the daily whole offering of the eventide, as it is written in the Torah portion of Pinhas (Numbers 28:8): “The other lamb you shall offer at twilight, preparing the same grain offering and libation as in the morning,” but in this Biblical verse, it is not written (see Numbers 28:4): “you shall offer one lamb in the morning,” and it is taught in [Midrash] Sifrei [B’midbar]: this verse, why is it mentioned? Wasn’t it already mentioned above in the portion (verse 4): “and the other lamb you shall offer it [at twilight]?” Because it states with it, “you shall offer one lamb in the morning,” behold that he did not offer up the one for the morning, I hear that he did not offer it up at twilight, the inference teaches us the latter verse (Numbers 28:8): “The other lamb you shall offer at twilight,” but if they deliberately [did not offer the lamb in the morning], he should not offer it at twilight, those who act deliberately, but other Kohanim are able to offer it.

לא הקטירו קטורת בבוקר יקטירו בין הערבים – that the incense is not found/on hand with one person, he should offer up the incense many times like that of a burnt offering, as we stated in [Tractate] Yoma [26a], that a person who did not ever engage with it repeatedly because it makes a person wealthy, as it is written (Deuteronomy 33:10): “They shall offer You incense to savor [and whole-offerings on Your altar],” and near it (verse 11), “Bless, O LORD, his substance,” therefore, we don’t fine them, since it is beloved for them and they do not willfully sin regarding it, and it is not found that those who sin deliberately will leave

שאין מחנכים את מזבח הזהב אלא בקטורת הסמים – at twilight/eventide, as it is written (Exodus 30:7): “he shall burn it every morning when he tends the lamps,” meaning to say, that when he cleans the Menorah from the ashes that are there from the kindling of the candles. But if he did not do the candle lighting in the evening, why does he need to repair it in the morning, so we see that the dedication of the Menorah is at twilight. And since the Menorah was dedicated in the evening, the incense is also dedicated in the evening, as it is written (Exodus 30:8): “And Aaron shall burn it at twilight when he lights the lamps, [- a regular incense offering before the LORD throughout the ages].”