Mishnah.org Logo

Today's Mishnah Yomi

Negaim 5:4 - 5:5

The Mishnah Yomi for Friday, December 4, 2026 is Negaim 5:4 - 5:5

Mishnah 1

Mishnayos Negaim Perek 5 Mishnah 4

נגעים פרק ה׳ משנה ד׳

4
Any doubt in negaim in the beginning is regarded as clean before uncleanness has been established, but after uncleanness has been established a doubt is regarded as unclean. How is this so? If two men came to a priest one having a bright spot the size of a split bean and the other having one of the size of a sela, and at the end of the week each had one the size of a sela, and it is not known on which of them the spreading had occurred, Whether this occurred with one man or with two men, each is clean. Rabbi Akiva said: if one man is involved he is unclean, but if two men are involved each is clean.
כָּל סְפֵק נְגָעִים בַּתְּחִלָּה טָהוֹר, עַד שֶׁלֹּא נִזְקַק לְטֻמְאָה. מִשֶּׁנִּזְקַק לְטֻמְאָה, סְפֵקוֹ טָמֵא. כֵּיצַד. שְׁנַיִם שֶׁבָּאוּ אֵצֶל כֹּהֵן, בָּזֶה בַהֶרֶת כַּגְּרִיס וּבָזֶה כַּסֶּלַע, בְּסוֹף שָׁבוּעַ בָּזֶה כַּסֶּלַע וּבָזֶה כַּסֶּלַע, וְאֵינוֹ יָדוּעַ בְּאֵיזֶה מֵהֶן פָּשָׂה, בֵּין בְּאִישׁ אֶחָד בֵּין בִּשְׁנֵי אֲנָשִׁים, טָהוֹר. רַבִּי עֲקִיבָא אוֹמֵר, בְּאִישׁ אֶחָד, טָמֵא. וּבִשְׁנֵי אֲנָשִׁים, טָהוֹר:
ד׳

בין אישר אחד – even though that which ever you turn, he has one bright white spot in the flesh that has spread, that which at its outset was like a split Cilician bean and now is like a Sela, he is fit to be declared a certified leper, nevertheless, since he (i.e., the Kohen) doesn’t know on which plague is declaring him to be a certified leper, he (i.e., the person) is pure, from the decree of the Scriptural verse, as it is written (Leviticus 13:22): “If it should spread in the skin, the priest shall pronounce him impure; [it is an affection],” the definitive plague he declares impure, but he doesn’t declare impure but he doesn’t defile the plague where he has doubt.

בין בשני אנשים – even though that one of them requires being shut up/isolated for seven days a second time at the end of the first week, and the other is a certified leper, but sine he doesn’t know which to shut up and which to declare a certified leper, both of them are pure from the decree from the Scriptural verse.

ר' עקיבא אומר כו' – but the Halakha is not according to Rabbi Akiba.

בין באיש אחד. אע״ג דמה נפשך יש בו בהרת אחת שפשתה, אותה שתחלתה כגריס ועכשיו כסלע, והיה ראוי להחליטו, אפילו הכי הואיל ואינו יודע על איזה נגע מחליט, טהור מגזירת הכתוב דכתיב (ויקרא י״ג:כ״ב) ואם פשה תפשה בעור וטימא הכהן אותו, את הנגע הודאי הוא מטמא, ואינו מטמא את הנגע שיש בו ספק:

בין בשני אנשים. אע״פ שאחד מהם טעון הסגר שבעת ימים שנית בסוף שבוע ראשון, והאחר מוחלט, הואיל ואינו יודע איזה להסגיר ואיזה להחליט, שניהם טהורים מגזרת הכתוב:

ר׳ עקיבא אומר כו׳ ואין הלכה כר׳ עקיבא:

Mishnah 2

Mishnayos Negaim Perek 5 Mishnah 5

נגעים פרק ה׳ משנה ה׳

5
"But after uncleanness has been established a doubt is regarded as unclean." How so? If two men came to a priest, one having a bright spot of the size of a split bean and the other having one of the size of a sela and at the end of the week each was of the size of a sela and a little more, both are unclean; And even though both returned to be the size of a sela both are unclean, and remain unclean until they return to the size of a split split bean. They is what they meant when they said, "but after uncleanness has been established a doubt is regarded as unclean."
מִשֶּׁנִּזְקַק לְטֻמְאָה, סְפֵקוֹ טָמֵא. כֵּיצַד. שְׁנַיִם שֶׁבָּאוּ אֵצֶל כֹּהֵן, בָּזֶה בַהֶרֶת כַּגְּרִיס וּבָזֶה כַּסֶּלַע, בְּסוֹף שָׁבוּעַ בָּזֶה כַּסֶּלַע וָעוֹד וּבָזֶה כַּסֶּלַע וָעוֹד, שְׁנֵיהֶן טְמֵאִין. אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁחָזְרוּ לִהְיוֹת כַּסֶּלַע וְכַסֶּלַע, שְׁנֵיהֶן טְמֵאִין, עַד שֶׁיַּחְזְרוּ לִהְיוֹת כַּגְּרִיס. זֶה הוּא שֶׁאָמְרוּ, מִשֶּׁנִּזְקַק לְטֻמְאָה, סְפֵקוֹ טָמֵא:
ה׳

שניהם טמאים – since it spread in both of them.

אף על פי שחזרו להיות כסלע – for now one of them is ritually pure, but since they were obliged to regard themselves/obligate themselves for defilement, both of them are impure, as it is written (Leviticus 13:23): “[But if the discoloration remains stationary, not having spread, it is the scar of the inflammation] the priest shall declare him pure”/"וטהרו הכהן" - that which is definitive, he (i.e., the Kohen) declares pure, but he does not declare pure the doubtful (see also Sifra on his verse in Leviticus).

עד שיחזרו להיות גריס – that now, certainly both of them are ritually pure, that the spreading that on whose account they were declared to be certified lepers has disappeared from both of them.

שניהם טמאין. דבשניהם פשה:

אף על פי שחזרו להיות כסלע. דהשתא אחד מהם טהור, הואיל והוזקקו לטומאה, שניהם טמאים. דכתיב [שם] וטיהרו הכהן, את הודאי הוא מטהר, ואינו מטהר את הספק:

עד שיחזרו להיות כגריס. דהשתא ודאי שניהם טהורים, שהפשיון שבעבורו הוחלט הלך משניהם:

Mishnah Yomi FAQ

Still have a question? Contact Us