Today's Mishnah Yomi
Kesuvos 10:5 - 10:6
The Mishnah Yomi for Friday, February 9, 2024 is Kesuvos 10:5 - 10:6
Mishnah 1
Change text layout:
Mishnayos Kesuvos Perek 10 Mishnah 5
כתובות פרק י׳ משנה ה׳
Bartenura
הראשונה קודמת לשניה. אותה שזמן כתובתה מוקדם קודמת לשניה שזמנה מאוחר. וכן כולם:
הראשונה נשבעת לשניה. אם שניה טוענת השבעי לי שלא גבית משל בעלי כלום, דלמא לא ישאר לי ממה שאגבה כתובתי. ואף שלישית תאמר כן לשניה, ורביעית לשלישית. אבל הרביעית נפרעת שלא בשבועה, וכגון שאין שם יורש או בעל חוב אחר שישביעה:
בן ננס אומר כו׳ פלוגתייהו דתנא קמא ובן ננס מפרש בגמרא כגון שנמצאת שדה אחת מאלו השדות שגבו השלש נשים הראשונות, שאינה שלו, שנודע שגזלה וסוף שיבואו בעליה ויטלוה, וכשבאה הרביעית לגבות כתובתה משדה רביעית באה זאת ואומרת לה למחר יבא הנגזל ויטול שדהו מידי, רצוני שתשבעי לי שלא גבית כתובתיך בחיי הבעל. תנא קמא סבר בעל חוב מאוחר שקדם וגבה מה שגבה לא גבה, הלכך למה תשבע, אם יבא הנגזל ויטרוף מזו תחזור היא על הרביעית ותטול ממנה מה שגבתה, דהויא לה רביעית בעל חוב מאוחר. ובן ננס סבר, בעל חוב מאוחר שקדם וגבה, מה שגבה גבה, ואם תחזיק זאת אין השלישית יכולה לחזור עליה, ולכך תשבע לה שלא גבתה מנכסי בעלה כלום. והלכה כתנא קמא. וממילא שמעינן שאם תפסה מטלטלין שצריכה לישבע לדברי הכל כיון שאין דין קדימה במטלטלין ומה שגבה גבה:
Mishnah 2
Mishnayos Kesuvos Perek 10 Mishnah 6
כתובות פרק י׳ משנה ו׳
Bartenura
וכתבה ראשונה ללוקח וכו' – as, for example when they purchased it from her hand, and in the Gemara (Talmud Ketubot 95a) it raises the question: Could she not say: “I merely wished to oblige my husband (i.e., her purchase was not to be taken seriously)? And it responds, as for example, that the husband sold this field [of his wife] to another man prior to that one, and the wife did not want to endorse it for this one, but she endorsed it for the other, and if it is that it is acting [in a manner that is] obliging to her husband, she would have endorsed the first [sale].
פשרה – adjustment/compromise; not everything to this one, nor everything to that one, and the language of “tepid,” – not hot nor cold.
וכן ב"ח – and two mortgaged properties. Reuven has a claim against Shimon for a Maneh, and he has two fields and sold them to two people – to this one for fifty and to that one for fifty, and the creditor wrote to the second purchaser: “I have nothing against you.” The creditor takes from the hand of the first, for he is not able to say to say to him: “I left you a place that you can collect from him, for his debt corresponds to both, and the first purchaser removes from the hand of the second, and the creditor returns and removes even that from the first, and the second purchaser from the creditor and goes back in turn until they make a compromise.
וכן אשה בעלת חוב – she had her Ketubah on her husband, and he sold his two fields to two [different] people but neither of the two had other than up to her Ketubah, and she wrote to the second [purchaser]: “I have no claim against you and nothing to do with you.” The woman removes from the first purchaser and he removes it from the hand of the second [and the woman from the first] and the second from the woman and the first purchaser from the hand of the second and it goes back in turn [until they make a compromise].
וכתבה ראשונה ללוקח וכו׳ וכגון שקנו מידה. ובגמרא פריך, ותימא נחת רוח עשיתי לבעלי. ומשני, כגון שמכר הבעל שדה זו לאיש אחר קודם לזה ולא רצתה האשה לחתום לו, ולזה חתמה, דאם איתא דנחת רוח עושה לבעלה היתה חותמת לראשון:
פשרה. ביצוע. לא כולו לזה ולא כולו לזה. ולשון פושרין הוא, לא חמים ולא קרים:
וכן בעל חוב. ושני לקוחות. ראובן נושה בשמעון מנה ולו שתי שדות ומכרן לשנים זו בחמשים וזו בחמשים וכתב בעל חוב ללוקח שני דין ודברים אין לי עמך, בעל חוב נוטל מיד הראשון, שהרי אינו יכול לומר לו הנחתי לך מקום שתגבה ממנו, שחובו כנגד שניהם ולוקח ראשון מוציא מיד השני, ובעל חוב חוזר ומוציא את זו מן הראשון, ולוקח שני מבעל חוב, וחוזרין חלילה עד שיעשו פשרה:
וכן אשה בעלת חוב. שהיה לה כתובתה על בעלה ומכר שתי שדותיו לשנים ואין בשניהם אלא כדי כתובתה, וכתבה לשני דין ודברים אין לי עמך, האשה מוציאה מיד לוקח ראשון. והוא מן השני, והשני מן האשה [והאשה מן הראשון] ולוקח ראשון מיד השני, וחוזרים חלילה:
Mishnah Yomi FAQ
What is Mishnah Yomi?
Mishnah Yomi is a daily study program where participants study two mishnayot (individual teachings from the Mishnah) every day. By following this program, one can complete the entire Mishnah in about six years.
What is the Mishnah?
The Mishnah is the first major written collection of Jewish oral traditions, forming the basis of the Talmud. It dates back to around 200 CE and consists of teachings and discussions of Jewish law by various rabbis.
Who started the Mishnah Yomi program?
In 1934, the Kozoglover Gaon, Rav Aryeh Tzvi Frommer, who took over from Rav Meir Shapiro (the founder of Daf Yomi) as the head of Yeshivas Chachmei Lublin, initiated the Mishnah Yomi cycle, focusing on Seder Zeraim and Seder Taharos. After World War II, in 1947, Rav Yonah Sztencl, a disciple of Rav Frommer, expanded the program, advocating for a comprehensive study of Shishah Sidrei Mishnah. The idea of studying two Mishnayos daily gained the support of figures like Rav Isser Zalman Meltzer, the Tchebiner Rov, and the Gerer Rebbe, marking the formal inception of Mishnah Yomi.
How long does it take to complete the Mishnah with Mishnah Yomi?
Following the Mishnah Yomi program, one can complete the Mishnah in approximately six years.
Can anyone join Mishnah Yomi?
Yes, anyone interested in studying the Mishnah can start the Mishnah Yomi cycle. There’s no need for prior knowledge; beginners are welcome.
Do I need to know Hebrew to study Mishnah Yomi?
While the Mishnah is originally in Hebrew, there are numerous translations and commentaries available in various languages, making it accessible to anyone interested in studying.
Is there a specific time of day to study Mishnah Yomi?
There’s no designated time. Participants can choose a time that best fits their schedule.
Can I study Mishnah Yomi with a group?
Yes, many communities and synagogues organize group study sessions for Mishnah Yomi. Studying in a group can enhance understanding and foster camaraderie.
What if I miss a day?
If you miss a day, you can catch up by studying the missed mishnayot alongside the current day’s study or by dedicating some extra time until you’re back on track.
הראשונה קודמת לשניה – hers whose time of her Ketubah precedes that of the second, whose time is later, and similarly for all of them.
הראשונה נשבעת לשניה – if the second [wife] claims: “swear to me that you have not collected from my husband anything, for perhaps there will not remain for me from what I will collect my Ketubah and even the third [wife] will claim the same thing to the second [wife] and the fourth [wife] to the third, but the fourth collects without an oath as for example if there is no heir or another creditor who will make her take an oath.
בן ננס אומר כו' – the disagreement of the first Tanna and Ben Nanos is explained in the Gemara (Talmud Ketubot 94a) as in the case where there is found one field from these field that the first three wives have collected which is not his, and it was known that he stole it, and eventually that its owners will come and take it and when the fourth [wife] comes to collect her Ketubah settlement from the fourth field, this one comes and says to her: “tomorrow the person who had been robbed will come and take his field; it is my desire that you will take an oath that you have not collected your Ketubah during the lifetime of the husband”; the First Tanna/teacher holds that the creditor of a later date who came early and collected, what he had collected, he did not collect; therefore, why should she take an oath if the person who was robbed will come and snatch it from this one. Let her return to the fourth [wife] and take from her what she collected, and hence the fourth [wife] would be a creditor of a later date. And Ben Nanos holds that a creditor o a later date who came early and collected what he collected, he has collected, and if she (i.e. the wife who came early) takes possession of this, the third [wife] cannot return to her, and therefore, takes an oath to her that she did not collect anything from the property of her husband and the Halakha is according to the First Tanna/teacher. Of itself, we learn that if she did not take hold of movable property, that she must take an oath, according to everyone’s opinion since there is no precedence as regards to movable property and what she collected, she collected.