Mishnah.org Logo

Today's Mishnah Yomi

Nazir 8:1 - 8:2

The Mishnah Yomi for Thursday, May 2, 2024 is Nazir 8:1 - 8:2

Mishnah 1

Mishnayos Nazir Perek 8 Mishnah 1

נזיר פרק ח׳ משנה א׳

1
With regard to two nazirites, where one other person said to them: I saw one of you become impure, but I do not know which one of you it was, they must each complete their naziriteship terms, shave their hair, and both together bring an offering of ritual impurity and an offering of purity, due to the uncertainty. And one of them says to the other: If I am the impure one, the offering of impurity is mine and the offering of purity is yours; and if I am the pure one, the offering of purity is mine and the offering of impurity is yours. And because of the uncertainty they each count a further thirty days of naziriteship and both together bring an offering of purity. And one of them says: If I am the previously impure one, that offering of impurity sacrificed earlier was mine, and the offering of purity was yours; and this offering sacrificed now is my offering of purity. And if I am the previously pure one, the offering of purity brought earlier was mine, and the offering of impurity was yours; and this current offering is your offering of purity. The previous mishna described how two nazirites sacrifice offerings of impurity and purity, in a situation in which one of them has become impure but they do not know which one. This mishna discusses what must be done if one of them dies before bringing his offerings. Rabbi Yehoshua said: The surviving nazirite asks someone in the marketplace, a non-nazirite, to vow to be a nazirite corresponding to him, i.e., under the same conditions as his own naziriteship, so that he can bring offerings together with him. And he says to him as follows: If I was impure, you are hereby a nazirite immediately; and if I was pure, you are hereby a nazirite after thirty days. And they both proceed to count thirty days and bring an offering of impurity and an offering of purity. And the nazirite who was defined as having uncertain impurity says: If I am the impure one, the offering of impurity is mine and the offering of purity is yours; and if I am the pure one, the offering of purity is mine and the offering of impurity we brought shall be of uncertain status. And they subsequently count another thirty days and bring an offering of purity, and the first nazirite says: If I was the impure one, the offering of impurity that we sacrificed at the end of the first thirty days was mine, and the offering of purity we brought then was yours; and this offering I am bringing now is my offering of purity. And if I was the pure one, and the deceased nazirite was impure, the offering of purity we brought thirty days ago was mine, and the offering of impurity we brought earlier was of uncertain status, and this is your offering of purity. Ben Zoma said to Rabbi Yehoshua: And who will listen to him to vow to be a nazirite corresponding to him? How can one design a halakha on the assumption that a non-nazirite will agree to be a nazirite for a lengthy term? Rather, a different procedure is available: After thirty days of naziriteship he brings a bird sin-offering and an animal burnt-offering, and says: If I was impure, the sin-offering is for my obligation as an impure nazirite, and the burnt-offering is a regular gift offering. And if I was pure, the burnt-offering is for my obligation as a pure nazirite, and the sin-offering is of uncertain status. And he counts another thirty days, and brings an offering of purity, and says: If I was impure, the first burnt-offering I brought should be considered a gift offering, and this one I am bringing now is for my obligation. And if I was pure, the first burnt-offering I brought is for my obligation as a pure nazirite, and this one I am bringing now is a gift offering. And these, i.e., the sin-offering and peace-offering I am sacrificing now, comprises the rest of my offerings that I was obligated to bring earlier. Rabbi Yehoshua said: According to your opinion, it turns out that this nazirite brings his offerings in halves, i.e., in stages. If he was pure, he brings his burnt-offering thirty days before the rest of his offerings. However, the Rabbis agreed with ben Zoma, and disregarded the concern about splitting up the offerings.
שְׁנֵי נְזִירִים שֶׁאָמַר לָהֶן אֶחָד, רָאִיתִי אֶחָד מִכֶּם שֶׁנִּטְמָא וְאֵינִי יוֹדֵעַ אֵיזֶה מִכֶּם, מְגַלְּחִין וּמְבִיאִין קָרְבַּן טֻמְאָה וְקָרְבַּן טָהֳרָה, וְאוֹמֵר, אִם אֲנִי הוּא הַטָּמֵא, קָרְבַּן טֻמְאָה שֶׁלִּי וְקָרְבַּן טָהֳרָה שֶׁלְּךָ. וְאִם אֲנִי הוּא הַטָּהוֹר, קָרְבַּן טָהֳרָה שֶׁלִּי וְקָרְבַּן טֻמְאָה שֶׁלְּךָ. וְסוֹפְרִין שְׁלשִׁים יוֹם, וּמְבִיאִין קָרְבַּן טָהֳרָה, וְאוֹמֵר, אִם אֲנִי הוּא הַטָּמֵא, קָרְבַּן טֻמְאָה שֶׁלִּי וְקָרְבַּן טָהֳרָה שֶׁלְּךָ וְזֶה קָרְבַּן טָהֳרָתִי. וְאִם אֲנִי הוּא הַטָּהוֹר, קָרְבַּן טָהֳרָה שֶׁלִּי וְקָרְבַּן טֻמְאָה שֶׁלְּךָ וְזֶה קָרְבַּן טָהֳרָתְךָ. מֵת אֶחָד מֵהֶן, אָמַר רַבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ, יְבַקֵּשׁ אֶחָד מִן הַשּׁוּק שֶׁיִּדֹּר כְּנֶגְדּוֹ בְנָזִיר, וְאוֹמֵר, אִם טָמֵא הָיִיתִי, הֲרֵי אַתָּה נָזִיר מִיָּד. וְאִם טָהוֹר הָיִיתִי, הֲרֵי אַתָּה נָזִיר אַחַר שְׁלשִׁים יוֹם. וְסוֹפְרִין שְׁלשִׁים יוֹם, וּמְבִיאִין קָרְבַּן טֻמְאָה וְקָרְבַּן טָהֳרָה, וְאוֹמֵר, אִם אֲנִי הוּא הַטָּמֵא, קָרְבַּן טֻמְאָה שֶׁלִּי וְקָרְבַּן טָהֳרָה שֶׁלְּךְ. וְאִם אֲנִי הוּא הַטָּהוֹר, קָרְבַּן טָהֳרָה שֶׁלִּי וְקָרְבַּן טֻמְאָה בְּסָפֵק. וְסוֹפְרִין שְׁלשִׁים יוֹם וּמְבִיאִין קָרְבַּן טָהֳרָה, וְאוֹמֵר, אִם אֲנִי הוּא הַטָּמֵא, קָרְבַּן טֻמְאָה שֶׁלִּי וְקָרְבַּן טָהֳרָה שֶׁלְּךָ וְזֶה קָרְבַּן טָהֳרָתִי. וְאִם אֲנִי הוּא הַטָּהוֹר, קָרְבַּן טָהֳרָה שֶׁלִּי וְקָרְבַּן טֻמְאָה בְּסָפֵק וְזֶהוּ קָרְבַּן טָהֳרָתְךָ. אָמַר לוֹ בֶן זוֹמָא, וּמִי שׁוֹמֵעַ לוֹ שֶׁיִּדֹּר כְּנֶגְדּוֹ בְנָזִיר. אֶלָּא מֵבִיא חַטַּאת הָעוֹף וְעוֹלַת בְּהֵמָה, וְאוֹמֵר, אִם טָמֵא הָיִיתִי, הַחַטָּאת מֵחוֹבָתִי וְהָעוֹלָה נְדָבָה. וְאִם טָהוֹר הָיִיתִי, הָעוֹלָה מֵחוֹבָתִי וְהַחַטָּאת בְּסָפֵק. וְסוֹפֵר שְׁלשִׁים יוֹם וּמֵבִיא קָרְבַּן טָהֳרָה, וְאוֹמֵר, אִם טָמֵא הָיִיתִי, הָעוֹלָה הָרִאשׁוֹנָה נְדָבָה וְזוֹ חוֹבָה. וְאִם טָהוֹר הָיִיתִי, הָעוֹלָה הָרִאשׁוֹנָה חוֹבָה וְזוֹ נְדָבָה, וְזֶה שְׁאָר קָרְבָּנִי. אָמַר רַבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ, נִמְצָא זֶה מֵבִיא קָרְבְּנוֹתָיו לַחֲצָאִים. אֲבָל הוֹדוּ לוֹ חֲכָמִים לְבֶן זוֹמָא:
א׳

שני נזירים שאמר להם אחד כו' – and they are silent for if they contradict, he is not believed, for one witness in a place where they contradict him is not believed, and our Mishnah speaks as for example that this person, the witness was not with them. But rather, he said, “I saw from afar defilement that was cast between them, that if the witness was with them in their place, it would be a case of uncertainty concerning ritual impurity in the public domain. And uncertain ritual purity in the public domain, in its uncertain state is [spiritually] pure, for uncertainty concerning ritual impurity we derive from the Sotah (i.e., the woman who is suspected of infidelity by her husband), as it is written regarding her (Numbers 5:13): “and she keeps secret the fact that she has defiled herself [without being forced, and there was no witness against her], and they were not other than her, and the person who engaged in sexual relations with her, and her uncertain state is seen as defiled. But whenever that they are more than two [people], even within the house, her uncertain state is seen as pure, and this is like uncertainty regarding ritual impurity in the public domain. Therefore, one must say that the witness was not with them in their place at the time of the uncertainty regarding ritual impurity.

וסופרים ל' יום – as for example when both made the vow of Naziriteship together and they took a vow of an undefined period of Naziriteship (i.e., thirty days). And the same law applies if both of them had taken a vow together and delineated their period of Naziriteship for a limited period, for after they had brought the sacrifice for defilement and the sacrifice of purity, they return and count the limited time period for their Naziriteship, and they set aside the sacrifice of spiritual purity.

וקרבן טומאה ספק – the sin-offering of fowl that comes for uncertain defilement and is not eaten.

אלא מביא חטאת עוף – for an uncertain defilement of Naziriteship. And he doesn’t bring the guilt-offering according to the Rabbis who state above that he brought his sin offering and did not bring his guilt-offering, he counts [his period of Naziriteship].

נמצא זה מביא קרבנותיו לחצאים – if he is a pure Nazirite, for the first burnt-offering was obligatory and now, he is offering the sin – offering and the peace-offering.

אבל הודו חכמים לבן זומא – and they did not take into consideration on one who brings his sacrifices in bits and pieces, and the Halakha is according to Ben Zoma.

שני נזירים שאמר להם אחד כו׳ והם שותקים, דאם הם מכחישין אינו נאמן, דעד אחד במקום שמכחישין אותו אינו נאמן. ומתניתין איירי כגון שזה העד לא היה עמהם, אלא אמר ראיתי מרחוק טומאה שנזרקה ביניכם, שאם היה העד אצלם במקומם הויא לה ספק טומאה ברה״ר, וספק טומאה בר״ה ספיקו טהור, דכל ספק טומאה מסוטה ילפינן לה דכתיב בה (במדבר ה׳:י״ג) ונסתרה והיא נטמאה, ואינן אלא היא והבועל, וספיקה טמא. וכל זמן שהם יותר משנים אפילו בתוך הבית ספיקו טהור, דהויא לה כספק טומאה ברה״ר, לכך צ״ל שלא היה העד בשעת ספק טומאה אצלם במקומם:

וסופרים ל׳ יום. וכגון ששניהם נדרו נזירות ביחד ונדרו סתם נזירות. וה״ה אם נדרו שניהם ביחד ופירשו נזירותם לזמן קצוב, שלאחר שהביאו קרבן טומאה וקרבן טהרה חוזרים ומונים הזמן הקצוב לנזירותם, ומפרישין קרבן טהרה:

וקרבן טומאה ספק. חטאת העוף הבא על הטומאה, ספק ואינה נאכלת:

אלא מביא חטאת עוף. לספק טומאות נזירות. ואשם אינו מביא, כרבנן דאמרי לעיל הביא חטאתו ולא הביא אשמו מונה:

נמצא זה מביא קרבנותיו לחצאים. אם נזיר טהור הוא. דעולה ראשונה היתה חובה ועתה הוא מקריב חטאת ושלמים:

אבל הודו חכמים לבן זומא. ולא חששו על שמקריב קרבנותיו לחצאים. והלכה כבן זומא:

Mishnah 2

Mishnayos Nazir Perek 8 Mishnah 2

נזיר פרק ח׳ משנה ב׳

2
In the case of a nazirite who, on the first day of his naziriteship, was impure from a corpse as a matter of uncertainty and was also a confirmed leper as a matter of uncertainty, i.e., it was uncertain whether or not he had leprosy, how can he fulfill the shaving obligations of a pure nazirite and an impure leper? The problem facing this nazirite is that a leper must shave both when he begins his purification process and at the close of it, one week later. However, a nazirite is prohibited from shaving. Additionally, a leper may not partake of sacrificial food, but a nazirite may. Therefore, he may partake of sacrificial food sixty days after he may have become impure, when the uncertainty with regard to leprosy will have been clarified. He shaves for the first time for his leprosy after thirty days, and for the second time thirty days later, the shaving of the end of the purification process; at which point he brings the offerings of a purified leper and may partake of sacrificial food. But he may drink wine and become impure from the dead, effectively ending his naziriteship, only after 120 days. This is because he might have been a full-fledged leper, which means that his shavings count toward his leprosy, not his naziriteship. Consequently, after the first sixty days he must observe another thirty days of naziriteship and shave again. Even then he has yet to fulfill all his obligations, as he might have been impure from a corpse, which means his shaving after ninety days was for his impurity. He must therefore remain a nazirite for another thirty days, before shaving one final time at the end of 120 days to fulfill his naziriteship obligation. The mishna notes: The reason that he cannot shave for his leprosy after seven days and perform the second shaving of a leper seven days later is because the shaving of leprosy overrides the prohibition of the shaving of a nazirite only when his status as a leper is definite. However, when his status as a leper is uncertain, the shaving does not override his naziriteship, and therefore he must wait thirty days before each of his shavings for leprosy.
נָזִיר שֶׁהָיָה טָמֵא בְסָפֵק וּמֻחְלָט בְּסָפֵק, אוֹכֵל בַּקָּדָשִׁים אַחַר שִׁשִּׁים יוֹם, וְשׁוֹתֶה יַיִן וּמִטַּמֵּא לְמֵתִים אַחַר מֵאָה וְעֶשְׂרִים יוֹם, שֶׁתִּגְלַחַת הַנֶּגַע דּוֹחָה תִגְלַחַת הַנָּזִיר בִּזְמַן שֶׁהוּא וַדַּאי, אֲבָל בִּזְמַן שֶׁהוּא סָפֵק אֵינָהּ דּוֹחָה:
ב׳

נזיר שהוא טמא בספק ומוחלט בספק – uncertain if he had been defiled by contact with the dead and uncertain if he was a declared leper.

אוכל בקדשים אחר ששים יום – but not before then, for someone who is uncertain leper, he or a witness that brings his atonement is forbidden to eat Holy Things but because of being an uncertain impure Nazirite, he is not forbidden from eating Holy Things, for he is not called someone lacking atonement who is forbidden to eat Holy Things other than a person whose defilement comes out upon him from his body. How so? He took the Nazirite [vow] for thirty days, and on the first day, there occurred to him an uncertain defilement through contact with the dead and uncertain leprosy He sprinkles and repeats it and immerses and is purified from his defilement from contact with the dead, as if he came to shave/cut his hair according to the law of an impure Nazirite, or according to the law of a leper who became healed. But, he is not able to shave/cut his hair until the thirty days from the day that he took the vow of Nazirite, lest he is a pure Nazirite, and he is forbidden to shave until the fulfillment of the days of his Naziriteship and until he brings his sacrifices, and after thirty days, he shaves the uncertain shaving of leper. Uncertain shaving of defilement of a Nazirite and uncertainty shaving of someone pure, and he brings two birds according to the law of the shaving for a declared leper. And the sin offering of a fowl that comes on the uncertainty, because of the uncertainty of his being a defiled Nazirite, and the burnt offering of an animal because of his uncertain status as a pure Nazirite, and even though he doesn’t bring the rest of the sacrifices of someone who is a pure person who has shaved, we state that if he shaved on one of the three sacrifices, he has fulfilled his religious duty. And he makes a condition upon it that if he is not a pure Nazirite, that the burnt offering will be a free-will donation, and the law of a declared leper that requires two shavings – one after the completion of his declaration when he became healed from his leprosy. And one after the days of his counting, after he counted seven days from the first shaving, as it is written (Leviticus 14:9): “On the seventh day he shall shave off all of his hair – [of head, beard and eyebrows].”But the one who is an uncertain Nazirite is not able to shave. Therefore, he must wait thirty days of uncertain pure Naziriteship and then he takes a shave of uncertainty for the days of his counting of the leper and the uncertainty of a pure Naziriteship. And he brings a burnt offering of cattle of uncertain Naziriteship in order to shave on the sacrifices and make a condition upon it. And on the day after his shaving, he brings the sacrifice of the leper to permit Holy Things to him. And he brings the sin offering of fowl for the sin-offering of cattle does not come on that which is uncertain. And he doesn’t bring the guilt offering. For the guilt offering does not prevent him from eating Holy Things, and it is found that after sixty [days], he eats Holy Things, for then he brings his atonement of the uncertainty of being declared, but he is still forbidden to drink wine and to defile himself through contact with the dead for perhaps he was a declared leper. But the shaving for a leper does not count for him, neither for the shaving of a pure Nazirite, nor for the shaving of an impure Nazirite, and he still needs two shavings: one for the impure Nazirite and one for the pure Nazirite. And if he was a declared leper, all what he counted for the days of his Naziriteship do not count for him. For the days of his declared [leprosy] and the days of his counting do not count for him. And he needs to count another thirty days and after thirty days, he shaves from being an uncertain impure Nazirite and an uncertain pure Nazirite. And he brings the sin-offering of fowl on being an uncertain impure Nazirite and the burnt offering of cattle for being an uncertain pure Nazirite, in order that he can shave on the sacrifice and makes a condition upon it. But he is still prohibited to drink wine or to defile himself through contact with the dead. For perhaps he was a declared leper and therefore, the first two shavings did not count for him for the sake of his Naziriteship, not for defilement nor for purity, for perhaps he was an impure Nazirite. And the third shaving is the shaving of defilement. Therefore, he is required to count another thirty days of pure Naziriteship, and he brings the sacrifice of a pure Nazirite and makes the condition, and afterwards is permitted to drink wine and to become defiled through contact with the dead. And similarly, if he took a vow of Naziriteship for a year, and something happened to him at the beginning of his year of uncertain defilement through contact with the dead, and uncertain leprosy, he counts a full year and shaves the shaving of uncertain defilement and uncertain purity and uncertain leprosy, ad counts a second year and shaves and brings his atonement and eats Holy Things [if he is a Kohen] and counts another two years prior to his drinking wine and defiling himself through contact with the dead.

נזיר שהיה טמא בספק ומוחלט בספק. ספק אם נטמא במת וספק אם הוא מצורע מוחלט:

אוכל בקדשים אחר ששים יום. אבל קודם לכן לא, דספק מצורע הוא ועד שיביא כפרתו אסור לאכול בקדשים. אבל משום ספק נזיר טמא לא מתסר לאכול בקדשים, דלא מקרי מחוסר כפרה שאסור לאכול בקדשים אלא מי שטומאה יוצאה עליו מגופו. כיצד, נזר שלשים יום. וביום הראשון אירע לו ספק טומאת מת וספק צרעת, מזה ושונה וטובל ונטהר מטומאת מת כאילו בא לגלח כדין נזיר טמא או כדין מצורע שנתרפא, ואינו יכול לגלח עד שלשים יום מיום שנזר, שמא נזיר טהור הוא ואסור לגלח עד מלאת ימי נזרו ועד שיביא קרבנותיו, ולאחר שלשים יום מגלח, ספק תגלחת מצורע ספק תגלחת טומאה של נזיר וספק תגלחת טהרה. ומביא שתי ציפורים כדין תגלחת חלוטו של מצורע, וחטאת העוף הבאה על הספק משום ספק נזיר טמא, ועולת בהמה משום ספק נזיר טהור. ואע״פ שאינו מביא שאר קרבנות של תגלחת טהרה, הא אמרינן אם גלח על אחת משלשתן יצא. ומתנה עליה שאם אינו נזיר טהור שתהא עולת נדבה. ודין מצורע מוחלט שצריך שני תגלחות, אחת לאחר גמר חלוטו כשנרפא מצרעתו, ואחת לאחר ימי ספרו לאחר שספר שבעה מן התגלחת הראשונה, כדכתיב (ויקרא י״ד:ט׳) והיה ביום השביעי יגלח את כל שערו, וזה שהוא ספק נזיר אינו יכול לגלח, הלכך צריך להמתין ל׳ יום של ספק נזירות טהרה ומגלח תגלחת של ספק ימי ספרו של מצורע וספק נזירות טהרה, ומביא עולת בהמה של ספק נזירות כדי לגלח על הקרבנות ומתנה עליה, ולמחרת יום תגלחתו מביא קרבן מצורע כדי להתירו בקדשים. ומביא חטאת עוף, שחטאת בהמה אינה באה על הספק. ואינו מביא אשם, שהאשם אינו מעכב מלאכול בקדשים. ונמצא שלאחר ס׳ יום אוכל בקדשים שאז מביא כפרתו על ספק חלוטו. ועדיין הוא אסור לשתות יין וליטמא למתים דשמא מוחלט היה, ותגלחת מצורע אינו עולה לא לתגלחת נזיר טהור ולא לתגלחת נזיר טמא, וטעון עוד שתי תגלחות, אחד לנזיר טמא ואחת לנזיר טהור, ואם מצורע מוחלט היה, כל מה שמנה לימי נזירתו אין עולין לו, שימי חלוטו וימי ספירו אין עולין לו, וצריך למנות עוד ל׳ יום ולאחר ל׳ יום מגלח ספק נזיר טמא ספק נזיר טהור, ומביא חטאת העוף בספק נזיר טמא. ועולת בהמה בספק נזיר טהור כדי לגלח על הקרבן, ומתנה עליה. ועדיין אסור לשתות יין וליטמא למתים, דשמא מצורע מוחלט היה, ולפיכך השתי תגלחות הראשונות לא עלו לו לשם נזירות, לא של טומאה ולא של טהרה, ושמא נזיר טמא היה ותגלחת השלישית תגלחת של טומאה היא, לפיכך צריך למנות עוד שלשים יום של נזירות טהרה, ומביא קרבן נזיר טהור, ומתנה, ואח״כ מותר לשתות יין ולהטמא למתים. וכן אם נדר נזירות שנה ואירע לו בראש שנתו ספק טומאת מת וספק צרעת, מונה שנה ומגלח תגלחת של ספק טומאה וספק טהרה וספק צרעת, ומונה שנה שניה ומגלח ומביא כפרתו ואוכל בקדשים, ומונה עוד ב׳ שנים קודם שישתה יין ויטמא למתים:

Mishnah Yomi FAQ

Still have a question? Contact Us