Mishnah.org Logo

Today's Mishnah Yomi

Shekalim 7:7 - 8:1

The Mishnah Yomi for Saturday, May 20, 2023 is Shekalim 7:7 - 8:1

Mishnah 1

Mishnayos Shekalim Perek 7 Mishnah 7

שקלים פרק ז׳ משנה ז׳

7
The fourth ordinance was about the salt in the Temple that was designated for salting the offerings, and the fifth was about the wood that was used for the burning of the offerings. These ordinances decreed that the priests may use them also to prepare the meat of the offerings that they eat. And the sixth ordinance concerned the red heifer: that deriving benefit from its ashes is not considered misusing consecrated property. And the seventh ordinance was about disqualified pairs of bird-offerings: It ruled that their replacements should come from public funds. Rabbi Yosei disagreed and says: The expense does not fall upon the public, but rather upon whoever supplies all the pairs of bird-offerings to the Temple; he must also supply, at no additional charge, the replacements for the disqualified birds.
עַל הַמֶּלַח וְעַל הָעֵצִים שֶׁיִּהְיוּ הַכֹּהֲנִים נֵאוֹתִים בָּהֶן, וְעַל הַפָּרָה שֶׁלֹּא יְהוּ מוֹעֲלִין בְּאֶפְרָהּ, וְעַל הַקִּנִּין הַפְּסוּלוֹת שֶׁיְּהוּ בָאוֹת מִשֶּׁל צִבּוּר. רַבִּי יוֹסֵי אוֹמֵר, הַמְסַפֵּק אֶת הַקִּנִּין, מְסַפֵּק אֶת הַפְּסוּלוֹת:
ז׳

שיהיו הכהנים נאותין בהן – specifically regarding the consuming of the sacrifices. But, regarding the eating of non-holy things, even the salting of non-holy things that are eaten in the Temple courtyard with the sacrifices in order that the sacrifices would be eaten with satiation, they don’t enjoy them (i.e., the salt and the wood).

שלא היו מועלין באפרה – for from the Torah, they cannot commit religious sacrilege with its ashes, as it is written (Numbers 19:9): “[A man who is clean shall gather up the ashes of the ow and deposit them outside the camp in a clean place, to be kept for water of lustration for the Israelite community.] It is for cleansing.” Through it they commit religious sacrilege but they don’t commit religious sacrilege through its ashes, but since they saw that they were despising it, they decreed that through its ashes is religious sacrilege because they saw that they separated themselves from the doubt of sprinklings, they established it as from the Torah.

ועל הקינין הפסולות – those obligated for bird-offerings they bring the money and place it into shofar-shaped chest and the Jewish court takes the money and purchases with them the bird-offerings and the owners go to them and rely upon the Jewish court that they will offer their bird-offerings but if the birds flew off or were found to be invalid, it is a condition of the Jewish court that they would take others from the monies of the chamber and give possession to the owners and fulfill through the their religious obligation.

רבי יוסי אומר – the one who regularly supplied the bird-offerings who fixed the price with the treasurers to sell them all the bird sacrifices that are needed, he is obligated to exchange all that is found in them something invalid, as is taught in the Mishnah (nine) above in the chapter “The Sacred Contributions”/"התרומה", he doesn’t receive his funds until the Altar is satisfied. But if the wine fermented or the fine flour became wormy, they return it to him and he returns the money, and the Halakha is according to Rabbi Yosi, for this is what we say in the Jerusalem Talmud that it is a condition of the Jewish court that whomever supplies the bird offerings supplies that which becomes lost or that is invalid.

שיהיו הכהנים נאותים בהן. דוקא לאכילת הקרבנות. אבל לאכילת חולין, אפילו למלוח חולין הנאכלין בעזרה עם הקרבנות כדי שיהו הקרבנות נאכלים על השובע, אין נאותים בהן:

שלא יהיו מועלין באפרה. דמן התורה אין מועלין באפרה, דכתיב (במדבר י״ט) חטאת היא, בה מועלין ואין מועלין באפרה. כיון דחזו דקא מזלזלי בה גזרו באפרה מעילה. כיון דחזו דקא פרשי [מאפר] הזאות, אוקמוה אדאורייתא:

ועל הקינין הפסולות. המחוייבין קינין מביאין מעות ונותנים לשופר, ובית דין לוקחין המעות וקונים בהן קינין, והבעלים הולכים להם וסומכים על בית דין שיקריבו קיניהן, ואם פרחו הקינין או נמצאו פסולים תנאי בית דין הוא שיקחו אחרים מדמי הלשכה ומקנים אותם לבעלים ויוצאין בהן ידי חובתן:

רבי יוסי אומר. אותו שהוא רגיל לספק את הקינין שפסק דמים עם הגזברים למכור להם כל הקינין הצריכים, הוא חייב להחליף כל שימצא בהן פסול, כדתנן לעיל פרק התרומה. אינו מקבל מעותיו עד שיהיה המזבח מרצה, ואם החמיץ היין או התליע הסולת מחזירין אותו למוכר, כך אם נפסל העוף אחר לקיחתו מחזירו לו, והוא מחזיר את הדמים. והלכה כר״י, דהכי אמרינן בירושלמי תנאי בית דין הוא המספק את הקינין מספק את האובדות ואת הפסולות:

Mishnah 2

Mishnayos Shekalim Perek 8 Mishnah 1

שקלים פרק ח׳ משנה א׳

1
The mishna discusses the ritual purity of items found either in the Temple or in Jerusalem and its environs, in continuation of the previous chapter’s discussion of found money, animals, or meat. All the spittle that is found in Jerusalem is ritually pure. Since neither ritually impure people nor gentiles were commonly present in Jerusalem, the Sages decreed an exception to the rule that spittle that is found is ritually impure since it presumably comes from one of those groups. This is the case except for spittle found in the upper marketplace, where gentiles and ritually impure Jews were likely to be present. This is the statement of Rabbi Meir. Rabbi Yosei says: On all the other days of the year, i.e., any day that is not on one of the three pilgrim Festivals, Passover, Shavuot, and Sukkot, spittle that is found in the middle of the street is ritually impure, and spittle that is found on the sides of the street is ritually pure. According to Rabbi Yosei, it was common for people who were ritually impure to be present in the streets of Jerusalem. They would be careful to walk in the middle of the street, while the ritually pure who wished to remain so would walk on the sides. Therefore, it is reasonable to presume that spittle found in the middle of the street is from one who is impure, while spittle found on the side of the street is from one who is pure. But during the time of the Festival, when most of the people in Jerusalem were there for the Festival and were ritually pure, the spittle found in the middle of the street was ritually pure, and that found on the sides of the street was ritually impure. The difference is due to the fact that at the time of the Festival, the ritually impure minority moves to the sides of the streets.
כָּל הָרֻקִּין הַנִּמְצָאִים בִּירוּשָׁלַיִם טְהוֹרִין, חוּץ מִשֶּׁל שׁוּק הָעֶלְיוֹן, דִּבְרֵי רַבִּי מֵאִיר. רַבִּי יוֹסֵי אוֹמֵר, בִּשְׁאָר יְמוֹת הַשָּׁנָה, שֶׁבָּאֶמְצַע טְמֵאִין וְשֶׁבַּצְּדָדִין טְהוֹרִין. וּבִשְׁעַת הָרֶגֶל, שֶׁבָּאֶמְצַע טְהוֹרִין וְשֶׁבַּצְּדָדִין טְמֵאִין, שֶׁמִּפְּנֵי שֶׁהֵן מֻעָטִין מִסְתַּלְּקִין לַצְּדָדִין:
א׳

כל הרוקין הנמצאים בירושלם אהורים – and we do not encourage the spittle of a man or woman suffering from an emission because they defile humans and utensils because we follow after the majority.

חוץ משל שוק העליון – because heathen launderers were found there and the Sages decreed concerning the heathens that they would be like men with a flux in all their matters, and their spittle is ritually impure. But there are those who state that that since the Upper Market did not have the benefit of the crossing found there (i.e., “foot traffic”) and men and women with a flux were alone and distanced themselves from other people that were found there.

שבאמצע טמאים – because men and women with a flux are frequently there and walk in the middle of the roads, and the ritually pure individuals remove themselves to the sides of the roads – in a place where there is not much walking found, and are careful of all ritually impure that they should not come in contact with them, but at the time of the Festival, when the majority of Jews are ritually pure, the ritually impure remove themselves to the sides so that they do not defile the people, and the ritually pure walk in the middle of the roads; therefore, at the time of the Festival, the spittle that is found in the middle of the road is ritually pure, but that which is on the sides is ritually impure, and the Halakha is according to Rabbi Yosi.

כל הרוקין הנמצאים בירושלים טהורים. ולא מחזיקינן להו ברוקו של זב וזבה שהן מטמאין אדם וכלים, משום דאזלינן בתר רובה:

חוץ משל שוק העליון. לפי שכובסין נכרים היו מצוין שם, וחכמים גזרו על הנכרים שיהיו כזבין לכל דבריהן ורוקן טמא. ואית דאמרי, לפי ששוק העליון לא היתה דריסת הרגל מצויה שם וזבין וזבות שמתבודדין ומתרחקין מבני אדם היו מצויין שם:

שבאמצע טמאים. משום דזבין וזבות שכיחי ומהלכים באמצע דרכים, והטהורים מסתלקים לצדי הדרכים מקום שאין דריסת הרגל מצויה ומזהירין לכל טמא שלא יגע בהן. אבל בשעת הרגל שרוב ישראל טהורין, הטמאים מסתלקים לצדדים שלא יטמאו את העם, והטהורים הולכים באמצע הדרכים, הלכך בשעת הרגל רוקין הנמצאים באמצע טהורים ושבצדדים טמאין. והלכה כרבי יוסי:

Mishnah Yomi FAQ

Still have a question? Contact Us