Mishnah.org Logo

המשנה היומית של היום

נדה ט׳:ד׳ - ט׳:ה׳

The Mishnah Yomi for Thursday, June 24, 2027 is נדה ט׳:ד׳ - ט׳:ה׳

＜ היום הקודםהיוםלמחרת ＞

משנה א

Mishnayos Niddah Perek 9 Mishnah 4

נדה פרק ט׳ משנה ד׳

4
In a case of three women who were sleeping in one bed and blood was discovered beneath one of them, all of them are ritually impure. If when the blood was discovered one of them examined herself and discovered that she was impure due to menstruation, she is impure and the other two are pure. And if none of them examined themselves, or if all of them examined themselves and were pure, they attribute the blood to each other, i.e., if one of them is unfit to menstruate, e.g., she is pregnant, she may attribute the blood to the other women who are fit to menstruate. And if all three women were not fit to see the flow of blood, e.g., they each belonged to one of the categories listed in the mishna on 7a, one considers them as though they were fit, and all three are impure, because the blood must have originated from one of them.
שָׁלשׁ נָשִׁים שֶׁהָיוּ יְשֵׁנוֹת בְּמִטָּה אַחַת וְנִמְצָא דָם תַּחַת אַחַת מֵהֶן, כֻּלָּן טְמֵאוֹת. בָּדְקָה אַחַת מֵהֶן וְנִמְצֵאת טְמֵאָה, הִיא טְמֵאָה וּשְׁתֵּיהֶן טְהוֹרוֹת, וְתוֹלוֹת זוֹ בָזוֹ. וְאִם לֹא הָיוּ רְאוּיוֹת לִרְאוֹת, רוֹאִין אוֹתָן כְּאִלּוּ הֵן רְאוּיוֹת:
ד׳
ברטנורא

ותולות זו בזו – that if the one [who saw blood] was pregnant, she blames the blood on the one who is not pregnant, and she is pure.

ואם לא היו ראויות – as for example that all of them were pregnant or all of them were nursing mothers, all of them are impure as if they are apt to see [blood], for nevertheless, blood fell from between them.

ותולות זו בזו. שאם היתה האחת מעוברת, תולה הדם בשאינה מעוברת, והיא טהורה:

ואם לא היו ראויות. כגון שהיו כולן מעוברות או כולן מניקות, כולן טמאות כאילו ראויות לראות, דמכל מקום דם מבינייהו נפק:

משנה ב

Mishnayos Niddah Perek 9 Mishnah 5

נדה פרק ט׳ משנה ה׳

5
In a case of three women who were sleeping in one bed that was located adjacent to a wall, and blood was discovered beneath the middle woman, all of them are ritually impure. If the blood was discovered beneath the woman on the inside, closest to the wall, the two innermost women are ritually impure and the woman on the outside is ritually pure. If the blood was discovered beneath the woman on the outside, farthest from the wall, the two outermost women are ritually impure and the woman on the inside is ritually pure. When is that the ruling? It is when they passed into their positions on the bed via the foot of the bed; but if they passed into their positions on the bed via the side of the bed, over the place where the blood was discovered, all of them are ritually impure. If immediately after the blood was discovered, one of them examined herself and she was found to be ritually pure, she is pure and the other two are impure. If two of them examined themselves and found that they were ritually pure, they are pure and the third is impure. If all three of them examined themselves and found that they were ritually pure, all of them are ritually impure, as the blood must have originated from one of them. To what case is this matter comparable? It is similar to the case of a ritually impure pile of stones with an olive-bulk of a corpse beneath it, where this pile was intermingled with two ritually pure piles, and they examined one of them and found it pure. That pile is pure and the other two are impure. If they examined two of them and found them ritually pure, they are ritually pure and the third is impure. If they examined all three of them and found them ritually pure, all of them are impure; this is the statement of Rabbi Meir, as Rabbi Meir would say: With regard to any item that has the presumptive status of ritual impurity, it forever remains in its state of ritual impurity, even if one examined the relevant area or item and the source of impurity was not found, until it becomes known to you where the ritual impurity is. The assumption is that the impurity was not found because the examination was not conducted properly. And the Rabbis say: One continues searching the relevant area until he reaches bedrock or virgin soil, beneath which there is certainly no ritual impurity. If no ritual impurity is found at that stage, presumably an animal dragged the olive-bulk of the corpse from beneath the pile, and the pile of rocks is pure.
שָׁלשׁ נָשִׁים שֶׁהָיוּ יְשֵׁנוֹת בְּמִטָּה אַחַת וְנִמְצָא דָם תַּחַת הָאֶמְצָעִית, כֻּלָּן טְמֵאוֹת. תַּחַת הַפְּנִימִית, שְׁתַּיִם הַפְּנִימִיּוֹת טְמֵאוֹת וְהַחִיצוֹנָה טְהוֹרָה. תַּחַת הַחִיצוֹנָה, שְׁתַּיִם הַחִיצוֹנוֹת טְמֵאוֹת וְהַפְּנִימִית טְהוֹרָה. אָמַר רַבִּי יְהוּדָה, אֵימָתַי, בִּזְמַן שֶׁעָבְרוּ דֶרֶךְ מַרְגְּלוֹת הַמִּטָּה. אֲבָל אִם עָבְרוּ שְׁלָשְׁתָּן דֶּרֶךְ עָלֶיהָ, כֻּלָּן טְמֵאוֹת. בָּדְקָה אַחַת מֵהֶן וְנִמְצֵאת טְהוֹרָה, הִיא טְהוֹרָה וּשְׁתַּיִם טְמֵאוֹת. בָּדְקוּ שְׁתַּיִם וּמָצְאוּ טְהוֹרוֹת, הֵן טְהוֹרוֹת וְהַשְּׁלִישִׁית טְמֵאָה. שְׁלָשְׁתָּן וּמָצְאוּ טְהוֹרוֹת, כֻּלָּן טְמֵאוֹת. לְמַה הַדָּבָר דּוֹמֶה, לְגַל טָמֵא שֶׁנִּתְעָרֵב בֵּין שְׁנֵי גַלִּים טְהוֹרִים, וּבָדְקוּ אַחַד מֵהֶן וּמָצְאוּ טָהוֹר, הוּא טָהוֹר וּשְׁנַיִם טְמֵאִין. שְׁנַיִם וּמָצְאוּ טְהוֹרִים, הֵם טְהוֹרִים וְהַשְּׁלִישִׁי טָמֵא. שְׁלָשְׁתָּן וּמָצְאוּ טְהוֹרִים, כֻּלָּן טְמֵאִים, דִּבְרֵי רַבִּי מֵאִיר, שֶׁהָיָה רַבִּי מֵאִיר אוֹמֵר, כָּל דָּבָר שֶׁהוּא בְחֶזְקַת טֻמְאָה, לְעוֹלָם הוּא בְטֻמְאָתוֹ, עַד שֶׁיִּוָּדַע לְךָ, טֻמְאָה הֵיכָן הִיא. וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים, בּוֹדֵק עַד שֶׁמַּגִּיעַ לְסֶלַע אוֹ לִבְתוּלָה:
ה׳
ברטנורא

תחת הפנימית – the one [woman] of the side where the wall is called the “inside,” and the “outer” is called to that one of the side through the path of ascending to the bed. And that which the Tanna/teacher [of the Mishnah] distinguishes here between that which is found underneath the “inside” to that found underneath the “outside,” for above (in the previous Mishnah) where it is taught, “and if blood is found under one of them, all of them are impure,” he doesn’t distinguish between that found underneath the “inside” and that found underneath the “outside,” it explains in the Gemara (Tractate Niddah 61a) that above we are speaking when they are in close contact and attached together. Therefore, one can doubt about the “outer” one even when the blood is found underneath the “inside” one.

אימתי -that they said that [if the blood] is found underneath the “outer” one, the “inner” one is pure.

בזמן שעברו דרך מרגלות המטה (bottom part of bedstead) – and the “inner” one did not pass on the place of finding blood.

אבל עברו שלשתן דברך עליה – that they are treading and passing over the [area of] the “outer” one.

כולן טמאות – and even the “inner” one, for perhaps when the “inner” one passed through there, it (i.e., the blood) fell from her.

לגל טמא (a defiled heap) – that there was an olive’s bulk from the dead person’s corpse there.

עד שמגיע לסלע או לבתולה – virgin soil. If he didn’t find it, the heap is pure. For I could say that a raven came and took the defiling thing. But here, when all three of them examined themselves and found themselves to be pure, the Rabbis agree with Rabbi Meir that all of them are impure, for this blood, from where did it come? Perforce it is from one of them. And the Halakha is according to the Sages.

תחת הפנימית. אותה של צד הקיר קרויה פנימית, וחיצונה קרויה אותה של צד דרך עליית המטה. והא דמפליג תנא הכא בין כשנמצא תחת הפנימית לנמצא תחת החיצונה, ולעיל קתני ונמצא דם תחת אחת מהן כולן טמאות, ולא מפליג בין נמצא תחת פנימית לנמצא תחת חיצונה, מפרש בגמרא דלעיל איירי כשהן תכופות ודבוקות יחד, הילכך איכא לספוקי בחיצונה אפילו כשנמצא הדם תחת הפנימית:

אימתי. אמרו נמצא תחת החיצונה פנימית טהורה:

בזמן שעברו דרך מרגלות המטה. דלא עברה פנימית על מקום מציאת הדם:

אבל עברו שלשתן דרך עליה. שהן דורסות ועוברות על החיצונה:

כולן טמאות. ואפילו פנימית, דשמא כשעברה פנימית דרך שם נפל ממנה:

לגל טמא. שהיה שם כזית מן המת:

עד שמגיע לסלע או לבתולה. קרקע בתולה. ואם לא מצא, הגל טהור, דאימור בא עורב ונטל את הטומאה. אבל הכא כשבדקו שלשתן ומצאו טהורות, מודו רבנן לר׳ מאיר דכולן טמאות, דהאי דם מהיכא אתא, על כרחך מחדא מנייהו הוא. והלכה כחכמים:

שאלות נפוצות על משנה יומית

עדיין יש לכם שאלה? צרו קשר