סנהדרין י׳:ו׳ - י״א:א׳

היתה רחובה חוצה לה – if the place of gathering the people of the city is outside of it, we bring them together into the city, for it is necessary to make for it a road inside it.

רחוב – a large thoroughfare.

הקדשות שבתוכה יפדו – that is to say, that they are not burned but the rquire redemption like the rest of the holy/dedicated objects.

ותרומות ירקבו – In the Gemara (Sanhedrin 112b) we establish it concerning priest’s due in the hands of a Kohen, for it is the money of the Kohen and a prohibition of the Apostate City takes effect upon it. However, the priest’s due is not burned like the rest of its booty, for we do not denigrate it all that much. Therefore, it should decay/rot, and if the priest’s due is in the hands of an Israelite, it is the booty of “On High” (i.e., God) and should be given to a Kohen that is in another city.

ומעשר שני – even though it is the money of an Israelite, for it is eaten by an Israelite, since it is called, “holy” (see Deuteronomy 26:13), it should not be burned, but rather hidden away.

כליל לה' אלהיך – Rabbi Shimon said, we read [in our Mishnah] and we don’t read: “as it states, “every whit unto the LORD your God” (Deuteronomy 13:17).

לא תיעשה גנות ופרדסים – that furthermore, completely, is implied.

כמו שהיתה – with the settlement in houses.

אבל נעשית היא גנות ופרדסים – And the Halakha is according to Rabbi Akiva.

אלו הן הנחנקין. ממרא על פי בית דין – he rebels against the words of the Great Jewish court that was in the Chamber of the Hewn Stones.

זוממי בת כהן – even though they come to make her liable for [the punishment] of burning [by drinking a molten-liquid], they are not judged other than through the death that they were making liable those who engaged in sexual intercourse with her, which is by strangulation, like the others who come upon a married woman, as it is written (Leviticus 21:9): “she shall be put to the fire,” she and not the person who engaged in sexual intercourse with her, and those who falsely testified [through scheming] against her, we derive from (Deuteronomy 19:19): “[You shall do to him] as he schemed to do to his fellow,” but not to his sister.

ובועלה – the daughter of a Kohen when she is married, but an engaged one, he and her sexual partner [are punished] by stoning.

שהמקלל לאחר מיתה חייב – as it is written (Leviticus 20:9): “he has insulted his father and his mother. [His bloodguilt is upon him].” And the extra verse is to include after death.

והמכה לאחר מיתה פטור – for he is not liable until he makes in him a wound, but there is no wound after death.

עד שיכניסנו לרשותו – as it is written (Exodus 21:16): “or if he be found in his hand”, and “his hand” means his domain. And similarly, it says (Numbers 21:26): “and taken all his land out of his hand,…”

וישתמש בו – usage that has the value of the equivalent of a Perutah/penny. And the first Tanna obligates him even with usage tha tis less than the equivalent of a penny. And the Halakha is according to the First Tanna.

הגונב את בנו – the reason that the Rabbis exempt him, as it is written (Exodus 21:16): “or is still holding him,” and it is an extra verse, for it is written (Deuteronomy 24:7): “If a man is found [to have kidnapped a fellow Israelite…]”, to extrapolate from it, and exclude this one, who is already in his power. And the Halakha is according to the Sages.

רבי יהודה מחייב – as it is written (Deuteronomy 24:7): “of his brethren of the children of Israel” – “of his brethren”, to exclude slaves, “of the children of Israel” – if it had written “of Israel”, we would have excluded someone who is half a servant and half a free-man. Now that it is written, from “of the children of Israel”, this is another exclusion, and where there is a double exclusion it indicates an exemplification (see Bava Kamma 86b). But the Rabbis hold, that “of his brethren” does not come to exclude slaves, for they are “brothers” in the commandments. Rather, the words “the children of Israel” excludes slaves; “of [the children of Israel]” excludes someone who is half-slave and half a free-man (see Mishnah Eduyot, Chapter 1, Mishnah 13 and Mishnah Gittin 4:5 which deals specifically with the case of someone who is a half-slave and half a free-man). And the Halakha is according to the Sages.