תרומות ט׳:ו׳ - ט׳:ז׳

הטבל גדוליו מותרים – with an incidental meal, when he ate [he needs to say, like the rest] of the eatables forbidden to be consumed pending the separation of sacred gifts, that their work was not completed.

בדבר שזרעו כלה – now the Tanna/teacher explains this matter that is taught in the Mishnah above (Mishnah 8), that eatables forbidden to be consumed pending the separation of sacred gifts, its growths are unconsecrated produce and they would not be so other than with something where its seed disintegrated.

אבל בדבר שאין זרעו כלה – meaning to say the garlic is considered that its seed disintegrates like the barley, and it (i.e., the Mishnah) took “barley” because there is nothing in the grains where its seed disintegrates and is lost quickly like barley. Another explanation: the garlic which is large like barley, its seed does not disintegrate, but less than the equivalent of a barley seed, its seed disintegrates. But the Halakha is not according to Rabbi Yehuda.

המנכש – tears out bad grasses that grow amindst the grain and the vegetables.

בחסיות – such as garlic and LOF (plants similar to colccasia, with edible leaves and root, and hearing beans – classified with onions and garlic) and onions and leek-green plants, all of these are called חסיות/leeks.

אע"פ שפרירותיו – of the idolater are eatables forbidden to be eaten pending the separation of sacred gifts, for this Tanna holds that there is no acquisition for an idolater in the Land of Israel to release him from the obligation for tithing, and the growth of eatables forbidden to be eaten pending the separation of sacred gifts is eatables forbidden to be consumed pending the separation of sacred gifts like something where the seed does not disintegrate, nevertheless, he eats from them an incidental meal.

שתילי תרומה – as, for example, saplings of cabbage and a species of beets. שנטמאו ושתלו טהרו מלטמא – and since they were attached/fastened to the ground, they became neutralized from he law of food. And if you should say that since the essence of the decree that the growth of heave-offering is like heave-offering, it is not other than because ritually impure heave-offering is in the hand of the Kohen, perhaps he will tarry near it and will become a stumbling block regarding him. Yet, since he purified it, he tarries with it. And one can say that heave-offering that is sold at a greatly cheapened price because it is not appropriate other than for ritually pure Kohanim and if it is defiled, it requires burning. Therefore, even if they would give heave-offering to a Kohen in order to sow it, he would [you must say “lose”] from abolishing his field. But if they were the growths of unconsecrated produce, he would detain the ritually impure heave-offering in order to sow it.

ואסורים לאכול – it is a mere preference.

עד שיגום האוכל – cut all that is appropriate for eating, and what will grow afterwards will be permitted.

עד שיגום וישנה – he will cutg what that grew also a second time, and and what that would grow from the second time onwards will be permitted. But the Halakha is not according to Rabbi Yehuda.